I HAVE FOUND IT NECESSARY TO UPDATE THIS ARTICLE BECAUSE, IN THEIR INFINITE WISDOM ,YOUTUBE DECIDED TO REMOVE SOME OF THE VIDEOS …..MOST HAVE EITHER BEEN REINSTATED OR REPLACED WITH MORE CURRENT VIDEOS….
How is it that the most infamous hate preacher in Britain is still free? Even after one of his former associates slaughtered Drummer Lee Rigby in South London, Anjem Choudary is still at large to spew his message of hate.
In the hours immediately after the Woolwich attack, Kent police arrested, handcuffed and charged an 85-year-old woman alleged to have made abusive remarks near a mosque. At the same time, police in Bristol arrested two men in their 20s alleged to have made offensive comments of a racial or religious nature on social media.
If such people can be found in breach of the law, how on earth can Britain’s most high-profile hate preacher not be?
After all, this is a man who said that Drummer Rigby deserved to ‘burn in hell’ after his murder.
Scotland Yard’s top counter-terrorism officer Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick says Choudary is being monitored ‘constantly’ to see if his preaching breaks the law. But monitoring is not what people want. They want him locked up.
The story of Anjem Choudary is both simpler than our officials like to admit and more complex than some people realise.
The complex bit is this: Choudary himself is a trained solicitor. For years he has cunningly tried to keep just within the bounds of laws. Other members of his groups haven’t been so careful.
Numerous members of Al-Muhajiroun — the banned extreme Islamist group that Choudary founded — have been sentenced to prison on terrorism-related offences during the 15 years the group, and its offshoots, were in existence.
The first was in 1999 when a member of the group was convicted for the attempted petrol-bombing of a London Territorial Army base the previous year. Since then, other members of the group have been convicted of bomb-plots, murder offences, terrorist fund-raising and numerous public order offences.
Research carried out by the Henry Jackson Society in 2011 revealed that, over the previous decade, one in five individuals convicted of Islamist-related terrorism offences in the UK was linked with Al-Muhajiroun. Despite the group being officially ‘proscribed’, it has continued its activities under a range of different names,the most current being Khilafah………(https://www.facebook.com/notes/prophet-hazrat-muhammad-peace-be-upon-him/what-is-khilafah/46964144347
Since 2011, at least nine individuals connected with the group have been convicted of involvement in three separate bomb plots. But how has Choudary himself got away with his incendiary comments?
Disturbing: Anjem Choudary said that Drummer Rigby deserved to ‘burn in hell’ after his murder
There are a number of explanations. The first is the care with which he speaks. While he refuses to condemn the actions of someone affiliated with his group who commits an act of terror, he is careful not to ‘glorify’ them.That is because, since the introduction of the 2006 Terrorism Act, ‘glorifying’ a terrorist act is an imprisonable offence.
Second, it has been police and intelligence agency policy for some time to regard Choudary as someone whose presence can flush out dangerous radicalised Islamists.
The theory is that young radicals are naturally drawn to him and his supporters. And because his group is under surveillance by intelligence agencies, those likely to present a threat can be flagged up and monitored more easily than if the network were ‘driven underground’.
Daily Mail reporter Douglas Murray witnessed the way this works:-
”In 2009, I was meant to debate with Choudary in London. It was organised by an ostensibly impartial student group. But just before I was due at the debate, I was informed by the police that it was not safe for me to be there. It transpired the event had been organised by an Al-Muhajiroun front with the group’s thugs ‘policing’ the event. Nevertheless, I did go and had a face-to-face encounter with Choudary and his goons in the street. What was interesting, as his followers swelled around me, was that the police were at a distance recording it all.”
Last year, one of those present was sent to prison. Mohammed Chowdhury was the linchpin of a cell convicted for conspiring to carry out an attack in London and bomb the Stock Exchange and other high-profile targets. The Security Service and police may well still consider their surveillance approach to Choudary to be the best one.
But in recent years two major problems have become clear. First, it is not fail-safe. The alleged Woolwich murderer Michael Adebolajo was on their radar, but he slipped under it.
Second, the policy of allowing Choudary to stay free while his activities are monitored has resulted in a growing disenchantment among British people with the security agencies. When the public hear Anjem Choudary saying that Drummer Rigby will ‘burn in hellfire’ and that Michael Adebolajo is ‘a nice man’, they can see that he is praising a suspected terrorist while attacking a victim of terror.
As he becomes more emboldened,Choudary, in a recent exploit ,warned Muslim restaurateurs, at a walkabout rally in Brick Lane in London,that they face being flogged if they sell alcoholic beverages.
SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE VIDEOS
Firebrand preacher Anjem Choudary recently defended leading dozens of Muslim protesters on a march through east London demanding businesses stop selling alcohol, warning: “This is just the beginning.” The group circulated leaflets in the Brick Lane area warning restaurants and off licence owners selling alcohol they face 40 lashes under Sharia law.
Around 60 men and women dressed in burqas handed the letters to Muslim-owned businesses.
In November 2008, Choudary organised a meeting of the newly formed Islam4UK, which, according to its website, was “established by sincere Muslims as a platform to propagate the supreme Islamic ideology within the United Kingdom as a divine alternative to man-made law”, and to “convince the British public about the superiority of Islam […] thereby changing public opinion in favour of Islam in order to transfer the authority and power […] to the Muslims in order to implement the Sharee’ah (here in Britain)”.
According to Ed Husain, co-founder of the counter-terrorism think-tank the Quilliam Foundation, Islam4UK was a “splinter group of al-Muhajiroun and Hizb ut-Tahrir, the originators of extremism in Britain.” The meeting, advertised as a conference to “rise to defend the honour of the Muslims”, was held at the Brady Arts and Community Centre in Tower Hamlets. Choudary then announced that Bakri would be speaking, via a video-conference link, although technical problems meant that his address was instead given over a telephone line.
When asked by a Muslim woman how the comments of one of the event’s speakers could be justified, with regards to Islam being a religion of peace, Choudary stated, “Islam is not a religion of peace … It is a religion of submission. We need to submit to the will of Allah.”.
AND THE FINAL INSULT TO THE COUNTRY THAT GIVES THIS VILE CREATURE A ROOF OVER HIS HEAD AND ALL THE BENEFITS OF A CIVILISED SOCIETY ,CHOUDARY NOT ONLY ADMITS TO LIVING OFF THE STATE THAT HE IS SO CRITICAL OF ,BUT HE OPENLY ENCOURAGES OTHERS TO DO SO!
However if you are a non-Muslim and a British patriot who dares to publicly criticise Islam or quote a speech from possibly the greatest leader and finest patriot our country has ever known,the late and great Sir Winston Churchill?
Odds are you will be bundled unceremoniously into the back of a police van and charged with a racially aggravated public order offence!…as was the case recently with Paul Weston of Liberty GB.
Paul Weston Interview complete April 27 2014
APPEASEMENT OF MUSLIMS MUST STOP RIGHT HERE AND NOW ,FOR THE GOOD OF OUR BLESSED COUNTRY ,FOR THE GOOD OF FUTURE GENERATIONS AND FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND WORLDWIDE….
As Winston Churchill once said “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile—hoping it will eat him last.”